Friday, March 30, 2007

Great Idea: The Bears and Lance Briggs

One of the reasons the Bears are hesitant to move Lance Briggs is because they don't know what they would do with the Redskins draft pick, #6 overall. There will be some great players available at a lot of different positions, but the Bears already have very few holes as it is.

Why would the Bears take Gaines Adams when they already have Ogunleye, Brown, and Anderson? Why would they take a defensive tackle like Amobi Okoye or Alan Branch (who wouldn't fit into their system anyway) when they just signed Anthony Adams to a four year contract, are getting back a totally healthy Tommie Harris (who'll be in for a big pay day soon), still have Tank Johnson, and get last year's third round pick, Dusty Dvoracek, back from injury? The Bears are one of the few NFL teams that don't need a cornerback (Vasher, Tillman, and Manning Jr. are all good), and they addressed their safety issues by acquiring Adam Archuleta. Also, none of the linebackers in this year's class are good enough to warrant the sixth pick.

Basically the Bears would be creating a hole and filling it with depth at other positions. That doesn't make any sense. With the amount of money you have to pay the sixth overall pick, is the trade really worth it?

Well Jerry Angelo, here's what you should do, bro. First off, offer Briggs one last long term contract. We know you don't want to tie up so salary cap space in linebackers, but Briggs is worth it. He's either your second or third best player, and his weakside linebacker position is so vital to the cover 2. If he turns it down give him the middle finger and trade him to the Skins' for the pick.

With that pick, #6 overall, take LaRon Landry, a guy who is one of the safest prospects in the draft. He'd start right away and he'll be one of the leagues top safeties in about a year. He's that good.

But then who'll fill Briggs' outside linebacker position, you ask? Adam Archuleta. Before you call this crazy, think about what Archuleta has done his entire career and why he struggled in Washington. He played linebacker in college, so you know he has some instincts already, and he has always been a guy who has excelled playing in the box (just look at his girlfriend). In the cover 2, linebackers play in deep zones anyway, so his experience at safety will only help. He got benched in Washington last year because they tried to make him into a cover oriented safety, which he couldn't handle. He'd be a perfect linebacker in the cover 2 and he's big enough (6'0, 223) where you would only have to bulk him up about 10 pounds.

No one wants to lose Briggs but the way he's acting and with the agent he has, you might have to. If you're going to trade him, the sixth pick is pretty good compensation for a guy that bitched his way out town. Landry is stud and will be better then Chris Harris and Daniel Manning combined from day one, and Arch gets to restart his career with a new team and new position. God, I'm a genius.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Arch at WLB has potential. LaRon Landry is definitely a stud. I'd venture to say safeties in the Cover 2 are more important than the cornerbacks. Landry would be a huge upgrade over Chris Harris.

The trade with Washington needs to go through. Make it happen Angelo, Briggs never played for Chicago as far as I'm concerned.